Baby Whales Pecked to Death by Gulls

Almost all southern right whale calves off the coast of Argentina’s Peninsula Valdez are being fed upon, some fatally, by kelp gulls, which was a rare occurrence four decades ago

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Gulls. You may have noticed that gulls can be pretty aggressive when it comes to grabbing food. But that behavior is more intense than you may know. Some kelp gulls snack on baby whales. Live baby whales.

In the early 1970s, only a handful of southern right whales were fed upon by kelp gulls off the coast of Argentina’s Peninsula Valdez. Back then just two percent of calves every year had to suffer at the beaks of the gulls, along with some of their mothers.

But now, 99% of the calves have to contend with hungry gulls driving their hooked beaks deep into their backs, ripping out chunks of skin and flesh and blubber, and gobbling it up. The finding is in the journal PLOS ONE. [Carina F. Marón et al, Increased Wounding of Southern Right Whale (Eubalaena australis) Calves by Kelp Gulls (Larus dominicanus) at Península Valdés, Argentina]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Each gull has its own whale and it protects it.” University of Utah Biologist Victoria Rowntree. “Or maybe two gulls will have its own whale, and they’ll chase off any gulls that come in. And they just sit in the water waiting for the whale to surface again…They’re relentless.”

 

Adult whales have learned to arch their backs when they surface to breathe, keeping most of their body away from the hungry gulls. But the newborns can’t do that.

 

“You can see the mothers getting so annoyed…when finally she’s been able to sleep, and she hasn’t arched her back, and she is isn’t horizontal to the surface, and her calf is sleeping next to her and then a gull comes along and BAMMO…I think the study I did in 1998 showed it took 30 minutes for them to return to normal behavior and not do this avoidance behavior.”

 

More than 600 calves died between 2003 and 2014. Some years at least a fifth of all newborns perished. Researchers wonder if the gulls might be, if not responsible, then at least contributing to the pattern. Rowntree looked at whether the dead calves had more gull-inflicted lesions than those that survived, but she found that all of the youngsters get harassed.

 

It’s not that the gulls are evil, of course. They eat to survive. The challenge for these researchers is to come up with ways of protecting the whales, without simply wiping out the gulls.

 

—Jason Goldman

 

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe