Bad Biodiversity Ups West Nile Odds

Low bird biodiversity areas tend to harbor those species most likely to carry and transmit West Nile virus. Adam Hinterthuer reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

If you're worried about news reports of West Nile virus, you might want to go take a census of the birds in your backyard. Because certain species of birds actually help the virus thrive. And they're not exactly exotic jungle fowl. In fact, they’re our more familiar feathered friends.

Work on Lyme disease has shown how fragmented forests common around cities and towns are home to lots of white-footed mice, which carry that disease. Inspired by this look into the ecology of disease, researchers at Washington University turned their attention to West Nile virus. They analyzed mosquitoes around the St. Louis area and found that rural plots with robust populations of numerous bird species harbored fewer infected mosquitoes than more "citified" settings.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The typical urban or suburban backyard usually only holds a handful of bird species, like crows, grackles, house finches and robins. And those birds are rich reservoirs for West Nile virus. Which ups the odds that a mosquito stalking a suburbanite may have recently fed on a bird carrying the virus. It's another example of how human activities alter the environment in unexpected ways that can often come back to bite us.

—Adam Hinterthuer 

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe