Ballooning Star Split Planet in Two

A recently discovered pair of exoplanets may be the wreckage of one formerly giant planet. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In about five billion years, Earth is going into the broiler. The sun will swell up into a red giant, engulfing us and the other inner planets. And that'll be that.

Or will it? Astronomers recently found two small planets orbiting very close to a star about 4,000 light-years away. The star has already passed through its red giant phase. So how did the planets survive? One idea was that the red giant had swallowed two formerly large planets and spit out the smaller cores. Imagine a star engulfing a Jupiter and leaving behind a scorched Earth—literally.

Now a new study proposes an even more violent explanation. Astrophysicists in Israel calculated that the two newfound planets might be the remnant of a single giant planet. That world would have been stripped to its core and then torn apart by the swelling star. The worlds now orbiting the former red giant would be the surviving, Earth-size chunks. ["A tidally destructed massive planet as the progenitor of the two light planets around the sdB star KIC 05807616," by Ealeal Bear and Noam Soker in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So a planet much bigger than Earth can escape total destruction when its star goes red giant. Although being broiled, pulled apart like taffy and tossed away is no planetary picnic.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe