Diets Don't Work
A meta-analysis from UCLA finds that--no surprise--most dieters gain the weight back and more in the long term.
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Here’s a story that can hardly be called news, but it bears repeating. Diets do not work. This latest revelation’s according to a report in the April issue of the journal American Psychologist. Researchers at UCLA did a meta analysis, a study of 31 other long-term studies. They think this research included every study that followed people on diets for two to five years. And they found that the majority of people regain all weight lost and then some. And that they would have been better off in the long run simply maintaining their heavier weight rather than stress the body by losing it and gaining it back.
Another four-year study of 19,000 healthy older men found that the single biggest predictor of weight gain was if a man had been on a diet at some point in the past.
So what actually does work for weight loss and long term maintenance? Surprise—moderate eating and regular exercise. When I asked a friend of mine how he had lost 50 pounds, he said he’d been on the ELFs diet. What’s the ELFs diet, I asked. His response: “Eat less food, stupid.”
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
