New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Best Acne Treatment Remains Elusive

For picking off pimples, few reliable studies exist to show clear benefits of one treatment over another. Katherine Harmon reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Pimples are part of teenage life about as dreaded and unavoidable as the SATs. To get rid of these blemishes, Americans spend more than a billion dollars each year. But just how well do widely used treatments work against these common bacterial infections?

That is unclear, say researchers in a new paper published online in The Lancet. [Hywel Willams et al., "Acne vulgaris"]

From over-the-counter creams to prescription pills, few purported zit-busters have been compared to see which is most effective—and for whom. More than half of acne med studies had what the researchers called "serious flaws," which make it especially hard to determine what approach might provide the biggest pimple-blasting bang for the buck.

What’s more, some treatments contain antibiotics, long-term use of which has been linked to an increase in antibiotic-resistant infections.

Lifestyle changes, such as diet and hygiene, seem to help for some, but none are proven cure-alls.

Although the understanding of acne treatments is pockmarked, researchers hope that further study will zero in on the most effective answers. Until then, expect pre-prom pimple conniptions to continue.

—Katherine Harmon


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[The above text is a transcript of this podcast]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe