New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Implants Could Produce Botanical Steve Austins

Inserted specialized carbon nanotubes could allow plants to harvest more energy from the sun or identify the presence of pollutants or dangerous substances. Cynthia Graber reports.  

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We have the technology. We have the capability to make the world’s first bionic" plant!

Engineered bionic plants that harvest even more energy from the sun, or detect pollutants or explosives, could become a reality. That’s according to a study in the journal Nature Materials. [Juan Pablo Giraldo et al, Plant nanobionics approach to augment photosynthesis and biochemical sensing]

M.I.T. researchers say that plants are a great technology platform: they can survive harsh weather and they are their own energy factories.

So the team turned to improving plants’ capabilities.

They inserted carbon nanotubes into the plants’ chloroplasts, the site of photosynthesis. The tubes capture wavelengths of light that plants usually don’t absorb, such as ultraviolet and green.

Living plants with nanotube-enhanced chloroplasts showed a 30 percent increase in electron flow, a key aspect of photosynthesis. No word yet on any subsequent increase in actual sugar production.  

The researchers turned plants into sensors by embedding carbon nanotubes that were engineered to fluoresce in response to nitric oxide, a pollutant from combustion. They’ve also created nanotubes that can detect chemicals including TNT and the nerve gas sarin. Pollution, pesticides and explosives could someday be monitored via bionic botanicals.

“Better. Stronger. Faster.”

Well, maybe not faster.

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Scientific American is a member of Nature Publishing Group.]
 

Cynthia Graber is a print and radio journalist who covers science, technology, agriculture, and any other stories in the U.S. or abroad that catch her fancy. She's won a number of national awards for her radio documentaries, including the AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Award, and is the co-host of the food science podcast Gastropod. She was a Knight Science Journalism fellow at MIT.

More by Cynthia Graber

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe