Implants Could Produce Botanical Steve Austins

Inserted specialized carbon nanotubes could allow plants to harvest more energy from the sun or identify the presence of pollutants or dangerous substances. Cynthia Graber reports.  

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We have the technology. We have the capability to make the world’s first bionic" plant!

Engineered bionic plants that harvest even more energy from the sun, or detect pollutants or explosives, could become a reality. That’s according to a study in the journal Nature Materials. [Juan Pablo Giraldo et al, Plant nanobionics approach to augment photosynthesis and biochemical sensing]

M.I.T. researchers say that plants are a great technology platform: they can survive harsh weather and they are their own energy factories.

So the team turned to improving plants’ capabilities.

They inserted carbon nanotubes into the plants’ chloroplasts, the site of photosynthesis. The tubes capture wavelengths of light that plants usually don’t absorb, such as ultraviolet and green.

Living plants with nanotube-enhanced chloroplasts showed a 30 percent increase in electron flow, a key aspect of photosynthesis. No word yet on any subsequent increase in actual sugar production.  

The researchers turned plants into sensors by embedding carbon nanotubes that were engineered to fluoresce in response to nitric oxide, a pollutant from combustion. They’ve also created nanotubes that can detect chemicals including TNT and the nerve gas sarin. Pollution, pesticides and explosives could someday be monitored via bionic botanicals.

“Better. Stronger. Faster.”

Well, maybe not faster.

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Scientific American is a member of Nature Publishing Group.]
 

Cynthia Graber is a print and radio journalist who covers science, technology, agriculture, and any other stories in the U.S. or abroad that catch her fancy. She's won a number of national awards for her radio documentaries, including the AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Award, and is the co-host of the food science podcast Gastropod. She was a Knight Science Journalism fellow at MIT.

More by Cynthia Graber

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe