Blood Protein Patterns Tell Tumor Potential

Is that lump malignant or benign? A blood test that measures levels of hundreds of different proteins may provide biopsy-equivalent answers. Wayt Gibbs reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A routine CAT scan turns up a suspicious spot. Is it a benign lump? Or a cancerous tumor? In the case of lung spots, four out of five turn out to be harmless. Unfortunately, making that determination takes a long needle and a biopsy, which means a puncture wound in the chest and a risk of infection.

Leroy Hood and colleagues at Seattle’s Institute for Systems Biology have devised a painless blood test that could eliminate the need for most biopsies.

They identified 371 proteins that coat lung tumors or leak out of them. Then they looked at blood samples taken from people who had had lung biopsies.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A pattern emerged: 13 proteins were significantly higher or lower in patients who had lung cancer than in those whose lumps were benign.

The researchers tried the blood test on different patients, and found that when it gave an “all-clear” result, it was correct 90 percent of the time. The work appears in the journal Science Translational Medicine. [Xiao-jun Li et al., A Blood-Based Proteomic Classifier for the Molecular Characterization of Pulmonary Nodules]

Indi, a diagnostics maker, is commercializing the blood test. Hood says the same approach should work for almost any disease—which could make diagnostics much less prickly.

—Wayt Gibbs

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe