Bonobo Peeps May Be Necessary Language Precursors

Animal communication studies have shown only fixed vocalizations, such as alarm cries. But Bonobo chimps appear to have a call that has different meanings in different contexts

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Babies sometimes laugh and sometimes cry. It doesn’t take a genius to decode the meaning of these sounds. But it isn’t quite as straightforward to decipher the meaning, if any, of an infant’s babbles. And humans a little older can make the same sounds regardless of how you actually feel—you’re able to say “I’m hungry” whether you’re ravenous or just gorged yourself.

Scientists think that the ability to make the same sounds across a range of emotional states is critical to language development. They also believe it to be uniquely human, because in previous studies of animal communication, researchers only observed fixed vocalizations. For example, bonobo chimpanzee pant-laughs and threat barks are tied to a specific emotion or behavior.

But the new study finds evidence that bonobos in the wild are also capable of flexible vocalizations. Bonobos have a specific call type, a “peep” that they use independent of emotional context. They peep while eating, travelling, grooming, resting, engaging in sexual activity, and even during shows of aggression.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because peeps, like a baby’s babbles, don’t convey meaningful information on their own, bonobos need to combine them with other calls and environmental context to supply meanings. Previously, researchers thought this type of complex, language-like comprehension was unique to humans. The study is in the journal PeerJ. [Zanna Clay, Jahmaira Archbold and Klaus Zuberbuhler, Functional flexibility in wild bonobo vocal behavior]

Bonobos are our closest evolutionary relatives, so it’s possible that the functional flexibility of human speech appeared in a common ancestor. This discovery adds to the growing pile of evidence that we’re not quite as special as we’ve long believed—and that our furry cousins may be even closer to us than we thought.

—Diana Kwon

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Bonobo sounds courtesy of Zanna Clay.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe