Brain Bluffs Humans Differently Than Machines

The temporal parietal junctions of poker players behaved differently when they were bluffing another human versus bluffing a computer. Cynthia Graber reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

You talk to a friend. Then you talk to Siri on the iPhone. Does your brain function differently when interacting with a machine versus another person? According to a recent study, there might be one small brain region dedicated to dealing only with people—in order to lie to them.

Researchers had 18 subjects play poker against a variety of human and computer opponents. The participants were encouraged to bluff—they’d get money if their bluffs were successful.

Sometimes they were given a weak hand. The researchers evaluated functional MRI signals of the players’ brains. Could they tell by looking at the brain patterns whether the player was about to bluff a human?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


They found that most regions of the brain that have been previously identified with social interactions lit up regardless of whether the subject was playing a person or a machine. But one small region—the temporal parietal junction, or TPJ—seemed to activate only when participants contemplated bluffing another human being.

The study was published in the journal Science. [R. McKell Carter et al., "A Distinct Role of the Temporal-parietal Junction in Predicting Socially Guided Decisions"]

Says study author Scott Huettel, “Social information may cause our brains to play by different rules than nonsocial information.” At least when it comes to deception.

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Audio clip of Scott Huettel courtesy of Science/AAAS.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe