Brain Smarter Than We Are

A study published in the journal Neuron finds that the subconscious brain is excellent at making decisions based on data. Whether we take advantage of that good decision, however, is another matter. Cynthia Graber reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

We humans don’t always make the best choices. But now a study in the journal Neuron demonstrates that maybe our brains do make the best possible decisions—but only if it’s done unconsciously. Alex Pouget at the University of Rochester takes a look at unconscious information gathering. He says a lot of our good decisions—like stopping at a red light—are unconscious ones.

Subjects stared at dots moving around in random patterns on a screen. A controlled number were heading towards either the right or left of the screen. The subjects were asked if the dots were moving left or right. The longer subjects stared at the screen, the more sure they became of the answer.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Pouget analyzed the subjects’ neuronal patterns. If a few dots in the group moved to the right, a part of the brain that recognizes right-direction movement lit up. As time went on, it’d light up more and more frequently until the subjects gave a definitive answer. According to Pouget, the subjects were subconsciously gathering information until they finally felt sure of the answer. So the brain usually gets it right. Too bad we still seem to run so many red lights.

—Cynthia Graber 

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe