Brain-Training Games May Not Improve Overall Intelligence

Brain-training games seem to temporarily improve specific tasks, but claims that they can improve overall brain function have yet to be proved. Christie Nicholson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Brain-training games claim that testing memory, attention and other forms of cognition will improve one’s overall intelligence and brain function.

And it’s probable that such games do improve performance on a specific task. But it’s unlikely that there’s a general improvement. That’s according to a study in the Journal of Neuroscience.

Sixty men and women played a computer game that tested their ability to withhold an action. The subjects saw a “go” signal—an arrow pointing either left or right—and they had to press a key, as quickly as possible, that corresponded to the signal’s direction. But 25 percent of the time a beep sounded just after the arrow appeared—which meant to not press the key.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Compared with a control group that never got the inhibitory beep, the game players’ exhibited heightened levels of activity in regions of the brain that control inhibitory action and emotion. But researchers found no change in other areas, for instance those that support working memory.

The researchers write that while brain-training games might temporarily improve a specific task, in this case inhibitory control, they may not lead to a general improvement in overall brain function. But they may still be fun.

—Christie Nicholson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe