Bread Texture Affects Salty Taste

Baked goods, which are a major source of dietary sodium, can taste as salty with less sodium through modifications in density and pore size. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Plan on breaking bread with friends and family this holiday season, but worried about the salt? Well, chemists may have come up with an enlightening solution. They’ve discovered that bread that’s more airy tastes saltier. The finding is in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. [Tabea Pflaum et al., Influence of Texture on the Perception of Saltiness in Wheat Bread]

There’s sodium chloride in everything we eat. It enhances flavor and improves the shelf life of foods. But too much salt can contribute to hypertension, and baked goods top the list of offenders. So can we cut back on sodium without saying no to dinner rolls?

To find out, researchers hit the kitchen and they whipped up some loaves with the same amount of salt but with different textures. By adjusting how long they allowed the dough to rise, they made breads that were either fine-grained and dense or more porous and light. And they found that volunteers rated the fluffier bread as tasting more briny.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


By collecting samples of their subjects’ spit, the researchers determined that bread with larger pores releases its sodium faster when it’s chewed. It’s that rush of sodium that makes salt a mouthwatering saline sensation—even if there’s less of it.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe