New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Bread Texture Affects Salty Taste

Baked goods, which are a major source of dietary sodium, can taste as salty with less sodium through modifications in density and pore size. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Plan on breaking bread with friends and family this holiday season, but worried about the salt? Well, chemists may have come up with an enlightening solution. They’ve discovered that bread that’s more airy tastes saltier. The finding is in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. [Tabea Pflaum et al., Influence of Texture on the Perception of Saltiness in Wheat Bread]

There’s sodium chloride in everything we eat. It enhances flavor and improves the shelf life of foods. But too much salt can contribute to hypertension, and baked goods top the list of offenders. So can we cut back on sodium without saying no to dinner rolls?

To find out, researchers hit the kitchen and they whipped up some loaves with the same amount of salt but with different textures. By adjusting how long they allowed the dough to rise, they made breads that were either fine-grained and dense or more porous and light. And they found that volunteers rated the fluffier bread as tasting more briny.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


By collecting samples of their subjects’ spit, the researchers determined that bread with larger pores releases its sodium faster when it’s chewed. It’s that rush of sodium that makes salt a mouthwatering saline sensation—even if there’s less of it.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe