Bumper Corn Looks Dicey in Drought
Corn plants bred to be planted very close together thrive in good weather but appear to be particularly vulnerable to the droughts predicted in the coming decades. Cynthia Graber reports
By Cynthia Graber
SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Earth
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Over the past decades, farmers have been getting bigger harvests from the same size plot of land. That story’s particularly true in the American Midwest, the world’s corn basket. The U.S. now grows more than 36 percent of the world’s corn.
One key is that breeders developed corn plants that can grow very close together. Newer varieties can better withstand stress and grow roots deeper to access water. So stalks are planted more densely and yields per acre are up.
But a study in the journal Science finds that as corn plants get closer together, they become more sensitive to drought. [David B. Lobell et al, Greater Sensitivity to Drought Accompanies Maize Yield Increase in the U.S. Midwest]
“What we did see for corn is that progress has been much greater for what we consider good weather conditions, so cooler, wetter conditions.” Study leader David Lobell of Stanford University, on Science’s podcast. “And when you get to the hottest conditions we see actually very little progress…the simple observation was that the sensitivity to those hot conditions seems to be growing over time.”
So in the hotter, drier climate predicted for the coming decades, the varieties of corn that currently produce bumper crops could be in trouble. “The impacts of drought are actually growing, at least in the case of maize.”
—Cynthia Graber
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
