Bye-Bye Bluefin Tuna

By failing to curb trade in the endangered ocean giant, the international community may have doomed it to extinction. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Tuna steak. Tuna tartare. Toro, as the Japanese call it, or the fatty underbelly of the

bluefin tuna served as sushi —a delicacy that became more common with the advent of cheap refrigeration in the 1960s. These are just some of the ways that humans consume one of the few warm-blooded fish.  

Unfortunately that love for bluefin tuna has led to


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


overfishing , despite the fish's ability to swim as fast as 80 kilometers per hour. The Atlantic population of the giant fish that grows to an average of more than 360 kilograms has fallen by 90 percent. And the estimated global population is less than half what it was in 1970.  

As a result, the U.S. and other countries proposed a ban on bluefin tuna trade to allow the pack-hunting ocean predator to recover. But the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species

rejected protecting the bluefin tuna via a secret ballot vote at its most recent meeting. After all, the fish is beloved cuisine in Japan, fetching as much as $175,000 for one fish.  

Nor is the bluefin alone. Its cousin,

yellowfin tuna, has begun to shrink—the first sign of a population crashing due to overfishing. Tuna may be off the menu soon, one way or the other.

—David Biello

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe