Message In A Bottle Of DNA

Researchers have hit upon a system for safely storing information in DNA that involves multiple copies of the message inserted into the genome of a common bacterium.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



DNA is already a data storage vehicle, perhaps the world’s oldest, in fact.  A gene can be thought of as coded data that can be translated by cellular machinery to make a functional protein.  Researchers have long considered the possibility of coding text as DNA.  So that a string of nucleic acids might represent the Gettysburg Address, or the locations of secret agents around the world.  In theory, it’s easy.  Just assign groups of nucleic acids to represent individual letters.  Then synthesize a strand of DNA that codes for “four score and seven years ago.”  But safeguarding against degradation, and being able to recover the data remain important issues. Now, Japanese scientists have come up with a technique that might help solve those problems.  They’ll report on it in April in the journal Biotechnology Progress.  The basic idea is redundancy.  Synthesize many copies of the message, and insert those all over the genome of a bacterium.  To recover the data, search the genome for multiple copies of a string of DNA and see what pops up.  The researchers did that with a common soil bacterium and the message E=mc2.  The system worked well.  Relatively.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe