California Tables Plans for RF Enhanced Driver's License
EDLs contain a RFID chip and let you rapidly reenter the U.S. at a land border without needing a passport. Proponents in California want to alleviate congestion at the Mexico border. Opponents worry about privacy. Larry Greenemeier reports
SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Tech
The California state senate recently passed a bill to offer driver’s licenses embedded with radio-frequency ID chips. It would have made California the first state bordering Mexico to offer so-called Enhanced Driver’s Licenses, EDLs. But the state’s Assembly Appropriations Committee shelved those plans.
EDLs let you rapidly reenter the U.S. at a land border without needing a passport. They’re already available in Michigan, New York, Vermont and Washington. The California committee ostensibly put its EDL plan on ice because they didn’t want to pay a few million dollars a year for it.
Legislators favoring EDLs said they would alleviate border congestion, which a US–Mexico chamber of commerce member says “has reached intolerable and inhumane levels.”
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Opponents objected to giving the government yet another way to track our movements. The RFID chip can be read dozens of feet away without an individual’s knowledge or consent, according to the ACLU.
It’s another case of technology being used to offer people a tradeoff between privacy and convenience. One thing California’s EDL plan had going for it: at least it would have been voluntary.
—Larry Greenemeier
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
