Can Charcoal Slow Climate Change and Improve Agriculture?

Adding biochar to soil might be a good way to cut pollution from agriculture while improving fertility. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The ancient inhabitants of Amazonia knew how to keep fragile soils fertile—and may have hit upon a way to combat present-day climate change. That technique? Biochar, or any plant or animal waste turned to charcoal and put back into the ground.

Studies suggest as much as 900 million metric tons of carbon a year could be locked up this way—and improve the soil's ability to grow crops as well. That's nearly 20 percent of current CO2 emissions as a result of burning fossil fuels.

And a new study shows that biochar could have an impact on agriculture's other greenhouse gas emission: nitrous oxide, or laughing gas, which is no laughing matter when it comes to climate change. Biochar applied to Australian fields and left for a number of months cut such emissions by more than 70 percent, as well as preventing nitrogen and ammonia from leaching out of the soil in water. Such fertilizer leaching is responsible for dead zones across the world, like the one at the mouth of the Mississippi River currently.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Of course, biochar is no panacea, despite fans like Richard Branson. Some studies suggest biochar can accelerate microbes degrading organic matter into dread CO2 in places like the boreal forests of the northern hemisphere. But perhaps charcoal is better in soil than burned as fuel for barbecues. The terra preta soils of Brazil are still being farmed, centuries after the biochar was added.

—David Biello

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe