Can Energy Labels Be Trusted?

Just how good is the Energy Star label? David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Gadgets and energy are a big problem. Just by failing to shut down computers overnight, U.S. workers waste some $2.8 billion worth of electricity. Our love affair with the Internet ends up emitting 2 percent of global carbon dioxide—roughly the same amount as air travel.

Fortunately, there's Energy Star, a program from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that sets standards for how much energy a given gadget can use. For example, in order to qualify for the blue and white logo a laptop must use 1.7 watts or less in sleep mode.

According to a new report by the EPA's Inspector General (pdf), an in-house watchdog, Energy Star approves mostly products that meet its standards: 100 percent of DVD players tested, 100 percent of monitors tested and 95 percent of the printers tested.

Unfortunately, however, some products that aren't Energy Star labeled, such as certain DVD players, perform "comparably to, and in some cases better than Energy Star products." And EPA itself does very little testing of gadgets. So did Energy Star really save 180 billion kilowatt-hours for consumers in 2007?

The solution is for EPA to begin testing all products to ensure that the ones that qualify as Energy Star really are the most energy efficient and cost-effective choice, and to make sure that those bearing the brand live up to the hype.

—David Biello

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe