Can Re-Wilding Work?

Introducing animal analogues of their extinct cousins might help repair otherwise irreparable ecosystem damage. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Europeans ate their way through the island nation of Mauritius, most famously eliminating the dodo bird. Less well known was their effect on the island now known as Ile aux Aigrettes or Island of White Herons, where they exterminated giant skinks and tortoises, and logged the native ebony trees for firewood.

In 1965 the largely denuded 25 hectares of the island were declared a nature preserve. But even in the absence of logging, the slow-growing ebony forests failed to thrive. Why? Because they had lost the animals that ate their fruit and dispersed their seeds.

Scientists have now rectified that situation, although you might call it a slow fix. Because tortoises are the key.

Researchers relocated four giant Aldabra tortoises to Ile aux Aigrettes in 2000.The tortoises ate the ebony trees’ large, pungent oval fruits and dispersed the seeds. By 2009, a total of 19 introduced tortoises roamed the island—leaving behind more than 500 dense patches of ebony seedlings. The project is described in the journal Current Biology.

For this tiny island, at least, re-wilding appears to have worked. And that holds out hope for other restoration ecology projects in the midst of the sixth mass extinction in Earth's history.

—David Biello

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe