Can the World Reach Peak Waste?

If the world's growing population embraces a throwaway culture, human civilization may drown in garbage. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

I probably throw away my own weight in garbage each month. That's the average for an American city dweller.

Urbanites like me create roughly twice as much trash as our rural counterparts. We city folk the world over produce three million metric tons of garbage each day.

And in the next decade or so, the amount of garbage worldwide could double. That's partly because more and more of us are living in cities—and there are more and more of us around.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In order not to live amidst ever higher landfills like in WALL-E, people will have to waste less. This can be done: The average Japanese urbanite makes just a third the trash produced by the average American, like yours truly.

We'll all have to turn Japanese if the world is to reach so-called “peak waste” before 2100. Peak waste refers to some highest ever amount of garbage produced daily, which then, it’s hoped, begins to fall. On current pace, garbage production could rise beyond 11 million metric tons per day by the end of this century. If we haven’t peaked by then, we could be living in garbage.

—David Biello

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe