Carbon Nanotubes Impale Compulsive Cells

The round-shaped tip of a carbon nanotube fools a cell into ingesting it, to death. A rough-hewn end may fix the problem. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Asbestos increases the risk for certain cancers. The fibers are thought to do so by skewering cells, setting off chemical reactions that lead to inflammation, DNA damage and cell death. Some studies have suggested carbon nanotubes might have similar effects—because they're long and spiky, like asbestos. But why would a cell draw in a nanotube, essentially impaling itself on a microscopic lance?

To find out, researchers exposed mouse and human cells to carbon nanotubes. They saw that the cells frequently engulfed the tubes—almost always tip-first. They then simulated that sword-swallowing maneuver on a computer. And they concluded that the round tips of nanotubes feel like bite-sized spheres, which cells commonly ingest. But once the cell senses the nanotube isn’t bite-size? It's too late. It can't stop sucking it in. The finding is in the journal Nature Nanotechnology. [Xinghua Shi et al., "Cell entry of one-dimensional nanomaterials occurs by tip recognition and rotation"]

As nanotubes may have medical applications, making them safe is key. And there may be a way to keep cells from biting off more than they can swallow—snip off the nanotubes' rounded tips. In one such simulation, the cells left the tubes alone—meaning we may get to have our nanotubes, without eating them, too.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[Scientific American is part of the Nature Publishing Group.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe