New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Carbon Nanotubes Impale Compulsive Cells

The round-shaped tip of a carbon nanotube fools a cell into ingesting it, to death. A rough-hewn end may fix the problem. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Asbestos increases the risk for certain cancers. The fibers are thought to do so by skewering cells, setting off chemical reactions that lead to inflammation, DNA damage and cell death. Some studies have suggested carbon nanotubes might have similar effects—because they're long and spiky, like asbestos. But why would a cell draw in a nanotube, essentially impaling itself on a microscopic lance?

To find out, researchers exposed mouse and human cells to carbon nanotubes. They saw that the cells frequently engulfed the tubes—almost always tip-first. They then simulated that sword-swallowing maneuver on a computer. And they concluded that the round tips of nanotubes feel like bite-sized spheres, which cells commonly ingest. But once the cell senses the nanotube isn’t bite-size? It's too late. It can't stop sucking it in. The finding is in the journal Nature Nanotechnology. [Xinghua Shi et al., "Cell entry of one-dimensional nanomaterials occurs by tip recognition and rotation"]

As nanotubes may have medical applications, making them safe is key. And there may be a way to keep cells from biting off more than they can swallow—snip off the nanotubes' rounded tips. In one such simulation, the cells left the tubes alone—meaning we may get to have our nanotubes, without eating them, too.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[Scientific American is part of the Nature Publishing Group.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe