Celebrity Auction Prices Depend on Contact and Character

The magical thinking concept of contagion, the transfer of essence through objects, comes into play at celebrity auctions, where items that were in close physical contact with the celeb fetch bigger bucks than other goods they owned. Allie Wilkinson reports 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Lady Gaga’s fake fingernails and Justin Timberlake’s partly eaten French toast have fetched big bucks at auction. Because these seemingly worthless items once belonged to a celebrity. Now a study finds that the price depends on the how much contact the celeb had with an item and whether they were heroes or villains. The research is in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [George E. Newman and Paul Bloom, Physical contact influences how much people pay at celebrity auctions
 
Data from auctions revealed that people spend more on items like jewelry rather than furniture, at least for well-liked folks such as JFK or Jackie O. Items from reviled celebs such as Bernie Madoff fetched lower bids.
 
The findings suggest that people’s desire for celebrity memorabilia stems from the belief in what’s called contagion: the idea that a person’s essence can be transferred through an object they touched.
 
A follow-up experiment further supports the contagion idea. Participants said they would pay substantially less for a celebrity darling’s sweater if it had been sterilized. But sterilization actually increased the amount subjects would pay for a sweater owned by a disliked celebrity. Gives a whole new meaning to money laundering.

—Allie Wilkinson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

 

Allie Wilkinson is a freelance multimedia journalist specializing in science, technology and the environment. Her work has appeared in National Geographic News, Scientific American, Discover, Popular Science, Slate, Popular Mechanics and various other publications in print and on the web. She is a 2014 Metcalf Fellow.

Allie is also the creator of This Is What A Scientist Looks Like, a community photo project aimed at challenging the stereotypical perception of a scientist.

Visit Allie's website.

More by Allie Wilkinson

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe