Chernobyl Opens for Tourism
Next month marks Chernobyl's 25th anniversary, and the site is now accepting tourists. Christie Nicholson reports
SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Earth
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Japan’s ongoing nuclear crisis is a gruesome reminder of another nuclear accident—the worst in history: Chernobyl is approaching its 25th anniversary. And, believe it or not, the area is open for tourism.
Just last week Scientific American contributor Charles Choi visited. He was accompanied by physicist Vadim Chumack of the Research Center for Radiation Medicine at the Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine.
So how safe is it to put Chernobyl on your eastern European itinerary?
Of the four radioactive materials released, Iodine 131 was gone after three months. But cesium 137 and strontium 90 both take about 30 years for their quantities to be halved. And plutonim 239 has a half-life of 24,000 years. Nevertheless, a day trip was probably okay by five years after the accident.
Choi reports that tourists are strictly limited to certain areas, avoiding such hot spots as the concrete shelter that seals off the damaged reactor. And visitors may catch glimpses of wildlife. Birds and insects have suffered, but some mamma populations have thrived, probably because of the conspicuous lack of people.
For more on Chernobyl after 25 years, check out Choi’s articles, blog posts and slide show at ScientificAmerican.com.
—Christie Nicholson
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
