China Surpasses U.S. in Energy Use?

China is now the world's number-one user of energy--unless you ask the Chinese. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The U.S has been the world's number-one user of energy for roughly a century, burning fossil fuels of all varieties with great abandon, fissioning uranium, even harnessing the power in wind and water. That's over now, according to the International Energy Agency, or IEA.

China consumed more than 2.2 billion metric tons of so-called oil equivalent in 2009, a measure born out of the same oil crisis that gave rise to the IEA. The U.S. fell back to just under 2.2 billion metric tons, thanks to the ongoing Great Recession. Ergo, we're number two. An analysis by BP agrees.

But hold on. Chinese officials immediately rejected the IEA's calculation, noting that their own official statistics showed energy use of roughly 3.1 billion metric tons of coal equivalent. A quick conversion makes that roughly 2.1 billion metric tons of oil equivalent.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Chinese blamed IEA confusion on a misunderstanding of China's energy efficiency efforts—as well as misunderestimating its buildout of renewable energy resources like wind turbines.

Regardless, per person, my fellow 310 million Americans and I use more than three times as much energy as more than 1.3 billion Chinese. Hence the meeting of 24 energy ministers in Washington, D.C., last week to attempt to hash out ways to use cleaner energy more efficiently, regardless of who's number one.

—David Biello

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe