New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Chinese Cave Graffiti Agrees with Site's Drought Evidence

Researchers linked dated graffiti about droughts in a cave in China to physical evidence in the cave of the water shortages, such as changes in ratios of stable isotopes in specific layers of stalagmites

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Historical instances of dramatic societal upheaval have been attributed to changes in climate. Now a cave in China has been shown to contain both physical evidence for specific periods of drought and written records of the hardships—in the form of graffiti—by people suffering from those droughts. The findings are in the journal Scientific Reports. [Liangcheng Tan et al, A Chinese cave links climate change, social impacts, and human adaptation over the last 500 years]

During the past 500 years, people made regular pilgrimages to the Dayu Cave in the Qinling Mountains of central China. During seven of the visits—the oldest one going back to the year 1520—pilgrims left messages on the cave walls related to droughts. Researchers were able to link those graffiti, which contain dates, to physical evidence of the water shortages. For example, lack of water caused changes in ratios of stable isotopes in specific layers of cave formations, such as stalagmites. The site has thus provided the first known case of historical and geological records existing in the same cave.

Cambridge University Earth scientist Sebastian Breitenbach is a co-author of the study. He says that records found in caves and lakes in the last decade reveal possible links between climate change and the downfall of several Chinese dynasties, including the Tang and Ming. He also notes, “Things in the world are different from when these cave inscriptions were written, but we're still vulnerable to these events—especially in the developing world.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Scientific American and Scientific Reports are both part of Nature Publishing Group.]

Cynthia Graber is a print and radio journalist who covers science, technology, agriculture, and any other stories in the U.S. or abroad that catch her fancy. She's won a number of national awards for her radio documentaries, including the AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Award, and is the co-host of the food science podcast Gastropod. She was a Knight Science Journalism fellow at MIT.

More by Cynthia Graber

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe