Chock-Full Church Made Choral Clarity
A doctoral student performed acoustic archaeology to determine how music could have been properly appreciated in a cavernous 16th-century church. Sarah Fecht reports
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Venice's Church of the Most Holy Redeemer has held a musical celebration every year since its construction in 1592. And recently, the church has inspired debate among historians: How could its echoing chambers clearly portray the complicated music performed during the festival?
A New York University doctoral student named Braxton Boren decided to find out. He recorded a choir within a non-echoing chamber. [first sound sample]
Next, he fed that audio into a computer simulation that he built based on the dimensions and materials of the church. [second sound sample] The muddled reverberations matched actual acoustic measurements taken within the empty church, demonstrating that the simulation was accurate.
Finally, Boren recreated what the music sounded like when the church was filled with sound-absorbing tapestries and people. [third sound sample] The new simulation reduced reverberations from seven seconds long to three and a half, making the music much clearer.
And so Boren settled the argument. Although to some historians he was preaching to the choir.
—Sarah Fecht
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
