Cold-Comfortable Mice Point to New Analgesics

Genetically engineered mice that can't feel cold are a step toward drugs that dull pain without numbness. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sick of feeling chilly? Well, there may be a solution. Because researchers have generated genetically engineered mice that can’t feel the cold. Their work is in the Journal of Neuroscience. [Wendy M. Knowlon et al., A Sensory-Labeled Line for Cold: TRPM8-Expressing Sensory Neurons Define the Cellular Basis for Cold, Cold Pain, and Cooling-Mediated Analgesia]

All mammals, us included, sense temperature and touch through nerve cells in the skin. On these nerve cells are different types of receptors that respond either to mechanical pressure in the case of touch, or to heat or cold.

Researchers were able to stop the production of the receptors for cold in the mice, while leaving the receptors for the other sensations intact. They put the cold-insensitive and normal mice in a box where the temperature of the floor ranged from a freezing 32 degrees Fahrenheit to a toasty 122. And they found that the normal mice avoided both extremes, while mice without cold receptors shied away from the hot plate but had no qualms about the chill.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Of course, the researchers were not trying to create comfy cold mice. The real intent was to see if it’s possible to stop just one skin sensation. The hope is to design drugs that can dull pain without leaving patients numb. And thus to provide not-cold comfort.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe