Comet Bops Past Neptune Cleanly

Comet Hale-Bopp has been spotted beyond the orbit of Neptune, far enough from the sun to be without its dirty tail. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If the solar system were a Peanuts cartoon, the role of Pigpen would be played by a comet. Comets are messy creatures: they surround themselves in a cloud of gas and dust and often carry a long tail of debris.

But even these celestial dirtballs clean up their act now and then. When a comet is far from the sun, it freezes and stops shedding material. In the case of Hale–Bopp, the Great Comet of 1997, that freeze-out has taken a while—astronomers have spotted Hale–Bopp out past the orbit of Neptune, where it’s finally chilling out. That’s according to research that’ll be published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics [Gyula Szabó, K. Sárneczky, and L. L. Kiss, "Frozen to death? -- Detection of comet Hale-Bopp at 30.7 AU"]

Hale-Bopp has far less sunlight-reflecting material surrounding it now than it did in 2007. So the comet's slovenly behavior has either tapered off to a low level, or it’s gone dormant and is no longer shedding material at all.

Either way, Hale–Bopp managed to travel billions of kilometers before giving up its messy ways, farther than any comet astronomers have ever seen. Even Pigpen couldn’t compete with that dedication to debris.

—John Matson

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe