Companies Inflate Their Twitter Follow Numbers

Many of the alleged Twitter followers for some companies are bots created by marketers to make the company look more popular. Larry Greenemeier reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Most Twitter users mark success by the number of followers they've attracted. Companies in particular want potential customers to know that legions of consumers are following their every tweet.

Take Dell Outlet, a Web site for buying refurbished computers. They claim to have more than 1.5 million followers. How did they do it? Well, they didn't actually.

A new research report analyzing Twitter followers of 39 international companies—including Dell, Coke and Vodafone—indicates nearly half of Dell Outlet's followers were likely created by marketers. On the other end of the spectrum, less than seven percent of Starbuck's followers were deemed to be dummy accounts.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers used software to analyze the profiles of 10,000 followers for each company they studied. Profiles with a user name, image, biography, at least 30 followers and proper punctuation, among other things, were deemed legit. Followers whose tweets contained only links to other Web sites, for example, were more than likely software-generated bot accounts.

I just hope this bit of apparent marketing manipulation doesn't discourage people from believing every single thing they see on Twitter.

—Larry Greenemeier

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe