New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Computer Training Boosts Bedside Manner

A computer training program improves how oncologists respond to negative patients. Katherine Harmon reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“So often patients aren’t satisfied with the communication they have with their doctor. And yet I know that physicians care so much about their patients.” James Tulsky, director of the Duke Center for Palliative Care.

Even the most skilled doctors can have a poor bedside manner. And research has shown that when patients are more comfortable with their doctors, it can improve mental and physical wellbeing.

Long training sessions can boost doctors' communications skills, but finding the time and money for such instruction can be challenging. So Tulsky’s team developed a software program to streamline the path to empathy. “Communication is a quality measure like any other quality measure. And we have the ability to improve it and to measure the improvements that we make.”

Doctors who attended a one-hour lecture on communication and worked through the one-hour personalized computer program improved their patient interactions compared to those who only attended the lecture. The findings are described in the Annals of Internal Medicine. [James Tulsky et al., "Enhancing communication between oncologists and patients with a computer-based training program"]

“One of the most gratifying pieces of this research was that nearly all the doctors said that they are now changing their practice based on having used this intervention.”

—Katherine Harmon

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[Tulsky audio via the Annals of Internal Medicine]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe