Computer Training Boosts Bedside Manner

A computer training program improves how oncologists respond to negative patients. Katherine Harmon reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“So often patients aren’t satisfied with the communication they have with their doctor. And yet I know that physicians care so much about their patients.” James Tulsky, director of the Duke Center for Palliative Care.

Even the most skilled doctors can have a poor bedside manner. And research has shown that when patients are more comfortable with their doctors, it can improve mental and physical wellbeing.

Long training sessions can boost doctors' communications skills, but finding the time and money for such instruction can be challenging. So Tulsky’s team developed a software program to streamline the path to empathy. “Communication is a quality measure like any other quality measure. And we have the ability to improve it and to measure the improvements that we make.”

Doctors who attended a one-hour lecture on communication and worked through the one-hour personalized computer program improved their patient interactions compared to those who only attended the lecture. The findings are described in the Annals of Internal Medicine. [James Tulsky et al., "Enhancing communication between oncologists and patients with a computer-based training program"]

“One of the most gratifying pieces of this research was that nearly all the doctors said that they are now changing their practice based on having used this intervention.”

—Katherine Harmon

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[Tulsky audio via the Annals of Internal Medicine]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe