Contest Takes Aim at Smart Guns

Competitions like the Firearms Challenge could give guns that use radio-frequency tags, biometrics and other tech a push into the mainstream. Larry Greenemeier reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Competitions, contests and challenges have become a potent way to inspire and fund innovation. The X PRIZE alone is shelling out tens of millions of dollars to incentivize scientists and engineers to develop new medical technologies, study the oceans and explore the moon.
 
Now one of the more unlikely competitions out there seeks to make firearms safer.
 
What’s called the Smart Tech Challenges Foundation last month launched its Firearms Challenge. The goal: find technology that reliably authorizes approved use—and blocks the unauthorized use—of guns and ammunition.
 
So-called smartguns have been in the works for years but haven’t gotten much traction.
 
The German company Armatix makes an intelligent pistol that requires the shooter to wear a special radio-frequency-ID-equipped wristwatch to activate the weapon. Ireland’s TriggerSmart likewise makes a gun unlocked by radio waves, as long as the shooter wears a special ring. Other companies rely on fingerprints and other biometrics or even sensors and smartphone apps to unlock their weapons.
 
Questions about the reliability of such high-tech weapons—and, of course, politics—have kept them from catching on the U.S. But efforts to improve firearm safety, including via smartguns, are worth a shot.

—Larry Greenemeier

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe