New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Crowd-Sourced Medical Research Gets Apple Assist

What’s called ResearchKit enables scientists to more easily write mobile apps that take advantage of iPhone sensors to study asthma, Parkinson’s and other diseases. Larry Greenemeier reports

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Apple Watch grabbed most of the headlines when it launched on March 9th. But for the scientific community, the company's new ResearchKit product is probably the more interesting development.
 
ResearchKit lets scientists more easily write apps for Apple’s operating systems—including apps that would let large numbers of iPhone owners contribute to crowd-sourced medical research.
 
Researchers at New York City’s Mount Sinai’s Icahn School of Medicine and Weill Cornell Medical College have already used ResearchKit in collaboration with a company called LifeMap Solutions to create the Asthma Health app to gather data from asthma sufferers.
 
According to Apple, ResearchKit has also already been used to write apps for collecting info on breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and Parkinson’s disease. These apps can take advantage of the iPhone’s many built-in sensors for collecting data, including the accelerometer, microphone, gyroscope and GPS. Asthma Health supposedly uses GPS data, combined with info about local air quality, to point out locations that asthma sufferers should avoid. And what’s called the mPower app for Parkinson’s uses the gyroscope to measure dexterity and gait stability.
 
Apple did not say whether its new watch could be integrated with ResearchKit. But the device was touted as being able to measure the wearer’s heart rate. So medical researchers will no doubt keep watching the watch.
 
—Larry Greenemier
 
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe