CSIs Could Estimate Victim's Age with Just Blood

Taking advantage of T cell by-products, a new technique may make it possible to estimate the age of a victim using only a blood sample. Cynthia Graber reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

You’ve seen it on TV. Crime scene investigators show up at what might be a murder scene. There are blood spatters—but no body. Who’s the victim? Now, a new technique developed in the Netherlands might help real-world investigators establish the age of the victim using only blood. The research was published in the journal Current Biology. [Dmitry Zubakov et al., "Estimating human age from T-cell DNA rearrangements"]

Usually, age is determined by physical characteristics, such as teeth or bones. Great—if you have a body. Researchers have tried unsuccessfully to use blood. But in this study, the scientists used immune cells called T-cells. T-cells recognize invaders through receptors that match molecules on bacteria, viruses, even tumors. The cellular activity that produces these receptors also produces a type of circular DNA molecule as a by-product.

The number of these receptor by-products declines regularly over time. So scientists devised a test to measure the molecules—and use that to infer someone’s age based on his or her blood. The results apear to be accurate to within plus or minus nine years. So forensic scientists could use a bloodstain to narrow a victim’s age to within two decades. That’s a big range—but it could help solve crimes when the victims can’t be found.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe