"Origin of Life Chemist" Stanley Miller

Stanley Miller, who died on May 20, performed one of biology's most famous experiments in 1952, when he showed that simple compounds could form amino acids when zapped with electricity.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


May 29, 2007  "Origin of Life Chemist" Stanley Miller

Stanley Miller died last week. Back in 1952 he performed what has become an iconic experiment in the history of science. One of the big questions concerning the history of life on earth was where did the complex organic compounds come from that all life needs to exist?  Researchers at the time had a pretty good idea that the early earth had ample amounts of hydrogen, water, which is just oxygen and hydrogen, methane, which consists of just carbon and hydrogen, and ammonia, made up of just nitrogen and hydrogen. 

Miller put water and ammonia into a flask with methane and hydrogen gas.  He then zapped it with electricity, to approximate the energetic input of lightning strikes and coronal discharges.  When he analyzed the results, the flask of course contained the same elements, nitrogen, carbon, hydrogen and oxygen.  But some very interesting chemistry had taken place.  The breaking of existing chemical bonds and the formation of new ones had turned the starting components into amino acids—the building blocks of protein.  And the now familiar notion of a primordial soup, from which complex biomolecules had sprung, was born.     

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe