For Online Consumption, the Web Is All About Cool

Back in 2006 the concept of the "long tail" stated that the Web will turn consumers into lovers of niche products and services, and that the days of the blockbuster are over. But the data tell a different story. Christie Nicholson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[Below is the original script. But a few changes may have been made during the recording of this audio podcast.]

One of the more well-marketed 'Web pronouncements" is the "the long tail," referring to a graph depicting consumer behavior online, with a high front hump, followed by a long, flatter tail. First coined in an article by Chris Anderson of WIRED magazine, it later became a book. 

Anderson predicted that niche consumerism would prevail in an era of unlimited choice online, and the olden days of one or two major blockbusters were over. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But a recent paper in the Harvard Business Review claims the Web has made no difference: When it comes to consumption, we continue to exhibit herd mentality. 

For instance, within Rhapsody, a music sharing site, the top 10 percent of tracks represented 78 percent of all plays. And for Quickflix movie rentals, the top 10 percent of all titles accounted for 48 percent of all rentals. 

Those who do search for obscure treasures were people who bought more overall—including the blockbusters. 

The data states the obvious: More choice leads to more buying, but more options doesn't mean our desire for the coolest thing goes away. 

In a lovely, ironic twist, the researcher points to a best-selling business book as an example of concentrated high sales of popular items, it is, of course, the book that inspired her in the first place: Anderson's The Long Tail.

—Christie Nicholson

60-Second Psych is a weekly podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe