Coffee and Cigarettes May Protect Some Against Parkinson's

Although tobacco and large amounts of caffeine are risk factors for many conditions, they apparently confer some protection to those with a predisposition for Parkinson's.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



There’s good news about…coffee and cigarettes???  Well, there is, in families where there’s a risk of Parkinson’s disease anyway.  Parkinson’s again is the nerve degeneration condition marked by tremors. 

Previous studies implied that smokers and coffee drinkers might have a lower risk of developing the condition.  So researchers at Duke University Medical Center took histories from 356 Parkinson’s disease patients and another 317 disease-free relatives of those patients.  In the April issue of the journal Archives of Neurology they reported the finding that the Parkinson’s sufferers were only about half as likely to have smoked as were their non-affected relatives and also were far less likely to drink much coffee.  Why smoking and coffee drinking apparently protect against the disease remains a mystery. 

The researchers were quick to point out that tobacco and large amounts of caffeine are risk factors for other conditions and should not be adopted in a misguided attempt at health.  Rather, the associations between coffee, cigarettes and Parkinson’s should point the way to further research to examine what kinds of environmental influences may be moderating the genetic predisposition toward the development of Parkinson’s disease. Rather, the associations between coffee cigarettes and Parkinsons should guide research to find out how environmental influences moderate the disease. 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe