Coffee and Cigarettes May Protect Some Against Parkinson's
Although tobacco and large amounts of caffeine are risk factors for many conditions, they apparently confer some protection to those with a predisposition for Parkinson's.
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
There’s good news about…coffee and cigarettes??? Well, there is, in families where there’s a risk of Parkinson’s disease anyway. Parkinson’s again is the nerve degeneration condition marked by tremors.
Previous studies implied that smokers and coffee drinkers might have a lower risk of developing the condition. So researchers at Duke University Medical Center took histories from 356 Parkinson’s disease patients and another 317 disease-free relatives of those patients. In the April issue of the journal Archives of Neurology they reported the finding that the Parkinson’s sufferers were only about half as likely to have smoked as were their non-affected relatives and also were far less likely to drink much coffee. Why smoking and coffee drinking apparently protect against the disease remains a mystery.
The researchers were quick to point out that tobacco and large amounts of caffeine are risk factors for other conditions and should not be adopted in a misguided attempt at health. Rather, the associations between coffee, cigarettes and Parkinson’s should point the way to further research to examine what kinds of environmental influences may be moderating the genetic predisposition toward the development of Parkinson’s disease. Rather, the associations between coffee cigarettes and Parkinsons should guide research to find out how environmental influences moderate the disease.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
