Sexual Orientation Controlled in the Brains of Worms
Biologists are able to turn on a gene in the brain of nematode worms that leads them to desire same-sex partners.
SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Mind
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Attraction is mystery we might not want to solve. You know, it’s sexier when science can’t explain it, and besides, we got to keep those freelance poets in business.
But science never lets anything alone, so research published this week in Current Biology reveals that our sexual orientation might, in fact, depend on the wiring of our brain at puberty. At least in nematode worms.
Originally, scientists thought that special smell neurons in male worms controlled their sexual preference. But experiments show that core neurons, which are common to both males and females, are really what makes the critical difference in same-sex attraction.
Scientists activated a gene called fem-3 in female brains during puberty – and while this did not change their body or genitalia, it did alter their sexual preference. The females liked other females.
So it appears orientation is not due to the sex hormones but more the wiring of the brain.
But, of course this is worms, and humans are a tad more complex…I mean our social behavior has some influence, and really, a knowing look across a crowded room is much more subtle than bumping into something that smells good in the dirt.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
