Autumn Leaves' Brilliant Colors Good For Trees

The bright red leaves of autumn deliver more nutrients to the trees than they would without the brilliant coloration. Karen Hopkin reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



Fall is here and across the country, leaves are turning their traditional autumn colors. And as always, the sight of so many trees decked out in brilliant reds, yellows, and golds, prompts leaf-peepers, kindergarteners, and even scientists to ponder—how come they do that?

After all, it takes energy to produce all those pretty pigments. So why would a tree bother to do it, if those leaves are only gonna turn brown and fall off, anyway?

Now, scientists at the University of North Carolina think they know the dirty secret: it’s the soil.  Surveying the sweetgum and maple trees in a nature preserve in Charlotte, the North Carolina researchers found that trees that grew in nutrient-poor soil produced more red pigment, results they just presented at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America.

Their findings back a discovery made in 2003, by a researcher in Montana, who found that blocking the production of red pigments, in plants that like to make them, renders their leaves unusually sensitive to sunlight. These super-sensitive leaves deliver fewer nutrients to the plant.

So when the soil is poor, it would make sense to make pigment, to keep those leaves working longer. Which is good for the trees—and for the peepers.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe