Desert Shrubs Could Suck Up Carbon

Planting the shrub jatropha in arid regions worldwide could sequester enough carbon to offset the annual CO2 pollution of China, the E.U. and the U.S. combined. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Hot, arid regions aren't the kind of place people usually farm. But a team of German scientists wants to change that in a bid to help cool down global warming.

The idea is simple: plant the weedy shrub known as jatropha in hot, dry lands around the globe. Based on data from existing plantations, each hectare of jatropha would capture 25 metric tons of CO2 per year while growing.

Given roughly 1 billion hectares of such land available for such plantations, that's 25 billion metric tons removed from the air, or enough to offset the annual CO2 pollution of China, the U.S. and the E.U. combined. And it could be kept up for 20 years or so. The research appears in the journal Earth System Dynamics. [K. Becker et al., Carbon farming in hot, dry coastal areas: an option for climate change mitigation]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


There's several catches of course. The poisonous jatropha would still need water to grow on this marginal land, and that is obviously hard to come by in arid regions. And land-grabbed jatropha plantations have had bad results growing the oil-seed crop for biofuels.

Regardless, the German scientists would like to set up a pilot plantation to test the scheme. Given the scale of the climate challenge, a few more shrubs can't hurt, and they just might help.

—David Biello

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe