New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Dig This: China Cuts Coal Production

The biggest single source of global warming pollution actually started to shrink in 2014. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


China burns a lot of coal. And that means the country digs up a lot of coal. But in 2014, for the first time in the 21st century, China's coal habit shrank.

The country dug up 3.7 billion metric tons of the dirty black rock in 2013. But last year that figure appears to have dropped to 3.5 billion metric tons. And coal imports fell by more than 10 percent.

These developments are part of the country’s new effort against pollution, which includes the cutback on coal burning to help reduce choking soot and smog in China's major cities. But the trend is also thanks to a slowdown in economic growth, including lower demand for steel for the first time in decades, which in turn lessens the need for coal to fire up the furnaces.

It remains too early to tell if this cutback in coal mining is a blip or evidence for the much-anticipated peak in the country's consumption of the most polluting fossil fuel. But it’s a good sign that China is on track to restrain global warming pollution in the next decade or so, as agreed under a lauded deal with the United States—the world's second largest polluter.

The U.S. has seen its coal habit shrink, too, thanks to increased use of natural gas. If the world’s top two polluting nations can permanently cut coal, that’s good news for a heating planet and billions of pairs of lungs.

—David Biello 

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe