New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Directional Acoustics Could Sharpen Ultrasound Images

Thin brass plates arranged into a tiny mazelike structure could direct sound waves in such a way as to make ultrasound imaging much sharper. Wayt Gibbs reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

I’ll never forget the day I saw the first ultrasound image of my peanut-size son-to-be. If only the pictures weren’t so fuzzy. Is it a boy or—is that her foot?

Now physicists at Nanjing University in China have come up with a method to clean up pictures made from high-pitched acoustic waves. Think of a one-way mirror—but for sound. Their system would let the pressure waves that carry sound pass through if they come from the left. But it reflects waves hitting it from the right.

No known natural material can do this. But a metamaterial—a clever arrangement of thin brass plates bent into tiny maze-like shapes—has just the right properties.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The metamaterial can even be tailored to steer the outgoing sound and to filter out all sounds except those of a particular frequency. That’s just what you want for a sharp ultrasound picture. The work appears in Applied Physics Letters. [Yong Li et al., Unidirectional acoustic transmission through a prism with near-zero refractive index]

The researchers are now building a prototype of their design. Maybe one day, the only thing fuzzy about those first fetal photos will be the way they make you feel inside.

—Wayt Gibbs

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe