Directional Acoustics Could Sharpen Ultrasound Images

Thin brass plates arranged into a tiny mazelike structure could direct sound waves in such a way as to make ultrasound imaging much sharper. Wayt Gibbs reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

I’ll never forget the day I saw the first ultrasound image of my peanut-size son-to-be. If only the pictures weren’t so fuzzy. Is it a boy or—is that her foot?

Now physicists at Nanjing University in China have come up with a method to clean up pictures made from high-pitched acoustic waves. Think of a one-way mirror—but for sound. Their system would let the pressure waves that carry sound pass through if they come from the left. But it reflects waves hitting it from the right.

No known natural material can do this. But a metamaterial—a clever arrangement of thin brass plates bent into tiny maze-like shapes—has just the right properties.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The metamaterial can even be tailored to steer the outgoing sound and to filter out all sounds except those of a particular frequency. That’s just what you want for a sharp ultrasound picture. The work appears in Applied Physics Letters. [Yong Li et al., Unidirectional acoustic transmission through a prism with near-zero refractive index]

The researchers are now building a prototype of their design. Maybe one day, the only thing fuzzy about those first fetal photos will be the way they make you feel inside.

—Wayt Gibbs

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe