Docile Island Animals Face Invader Threat

A meta-analysis finds that island-dwelling lizards are less anxious than their mainland relatives, which could pose a survival problem should a new predator arrive on the scene. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When Darwin explored Saint Paul's Rocks off the coast of Brazil, he found just two kinds of birds. He wrote: "Both are of a tame and stupid disposition...I could have killed any number of them with my geological hammer." Darwin's hunch was that creatures living on remote islands were less wary of predators--because in many cases, there weren't any.

And it seems he was right. Because by analyzing dozens of past studies, researchers have found that island lizards are indeed less skittish than their mainland relatives. That finding appears in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B. [William E. Cooper, Jr., R. Alexander Pyron and Theodore Garland, Jr., Island tameness: living on islands reduces flight initiation distance]

Problem is, that mellow island lifestyle could endanger the lizards, if invasive predators show up. "The lizards in the islands will be a lot more vulnerable.” That’s evolutionary biologist Theodore Garland, Jr,, a member of the study research team. “They will allow those new predators to approach to a closer distance, which is going to probably greatly increase the chance that they'll actually be captured by an introduced predator." Which suggests that, compared to mainlanders, island fauna don't stand a fighting chance—unless we keep invasive predators at bay.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe