Does Solar Power Need a Revolution?

Some argue that major technical breakthroughs are needed to make electricity from sunshine cheap. Are they right? David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Do the photovoltaics that can transform sunshine into electricity require a revolution? Our current Secretary of Energy and Nobel Prize–winner Steven Chu thinks so.

But Subhendu Guha, chairman of PV maker Uni-Solar, disagrees: "People say we need a revolution to get to grid parity. The revolution has already happened."

Uni-Solar manufactures thin-film solar cells made from amorphous silicon. The company has built a machine in Auburn Hills Michigan that churns out nine miles of such photovoltaics in 62 hours—and Guha hopes to make the revolutionary machine even bigger soon.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Uni-Solar is not alone. Manufacturers that make traditional crystalline silicon solar panels are boosting efficiencies and dropping prices thanks to equipment improvements plus cheap Chinese labor and materials. Another U.S. company, First Solar, claims it can make its variety of thin-film solar cells for less than $1 per watt.

That's been the goal of solar panel makers for a long time, because as those prices decline electricity from the sun costs the same as, or is even cheaper than electricity from burning fossil fuels. And that means a "deployment revolution" might be imminent or, as Guha says, "a roof is a terrible thing to waste."

—David Biello

 

 

 

 

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe