New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Dog Dust Protects Rodent Respiration

Exposure to dust taken from a dog owner's home prevented allergies and airway infection in mice. Karen Hopkin reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Just thinking about dust almost makes you sneeze. So you might think a house with dust and a dog would be a recipe for respiratory distress. Well, think again. Because a new study shows that exposure to dust taken from a dog owner’s home actually prevents allergies and airway infection. In mice, at least. The findings appear in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Kei E. Fujimura et al., House dust exposure mediates gut microbiome Lactobacillus enrichment and airway immune defense against allergens and virus infection]

It’s been known for some time that early exposure to a furry companion can reduce the risk of childhood allergies and asthma. To find out why, researchers treated mice with dust from two homes: one with a canine resident and one that was pet-free.

Turns out that the rodents that were sprinkled with dog-imbued dust mounted a less aggressive immune response against a common allergen, cockroach protein.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Probing a little deeper, the researchers found that the dog-dust mice had bacteria in their gut not found in the other mice, including a ton of one species of lactobacillus. Exposing other mice to that bug alone warded off an allergic response, and even protected them from infection with a respiratory virus.

So go tell Fido know that he’s a good boy. Because even if he doesn’t fetch your slippers, he’s likely contributing to your good health.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe