Don't Treat Old Gadgets Like Garbage

E-waste is a large--and growing--problem that can be addressed by thoughtful disposal, David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Did you get a new tablet or computer this holiday season? A new smartphone? Maybe a new TV? Here's a question to tell if you’re naughty or nice: what will you do with the old one?

Most people just throw old gadgets away. That's how nearly 50 million metric tons of so-called e-waste were produced in 2012—the weight of 150 Empire State Buildings. By 2017, that flood of e-waste will grow to more than 65 million metric tons—or 11 Great Pyramids worth. That’s according to a study from researchers at the UN, EPA and elsewhere.

Improper disposal of e-waste has led to some of the world's most toxic pollution hotspots. It's also a waste of resources, like valuable rare earth metals.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


China produces the most total e-waste. But we Americans hold the title for biggest individual gadget lovers—and wasters. We produced an average of roughly 30 kilograms of e-waste per person in 2012. Impressive, given how light our gizmos are.

Reuse and recycling is the obvious answer. Good options exist, including some offered by gadget makers themselves, like Apple. But be careful. Some unscrupulous recyclers here in the U.S. simply dump the trashed gadgets overseas. And that's no gift.

—David Biello

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe