Checkers Computer Can't Be Beat

It took more than 18 years, but computer scientists have completely solved the game of chess, with a program that can be tied but never beaten. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


July 20, 2007  Checkers Computer Can't Be Beat

It’s checkmate for checkers.  The 5,000 year old game has been completely solved, and a checkers-playing computer called Chinook cannot be beaten.  That’s according to University of Alberta computer scientists publishing in the latest issue of the journal Science.  

The researchers spent almost two decades going through the 500 billion billion possible checkers positions, which is still an infinitesimally small fraction of the number of chess positions, by the way.  The checkers effort included top players, who helped the research team program checkers rules of thumb into software that categorized moves as successful or unsuccessful.  Then the researchers let the program run, on an average of 50 computers daily.  Some days, the program ran on 200 machines.  While the researchers monitored progress and tweaked the program accordingly.  In fact, Chinook beat humans to win the checkers world championship back in 1994. 

(Computer voice): But it had not yet become perfect.

That process is now done, and the Chinook program has developed into a database that knows the optimal move in any possible checkers situation.  If a human opponent plays a perfect game, he or she can only hope for a tie. 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe