Kurt Vonnegut's Ice-Nine; and Friday the 13th Revisited
Kurt Vonnegut, who died April 11, was a chemistry major who indirectly got the idea for the Ice-Nine in the novel Cat's Cradle from a Nobel Laureate. And a look at the science of Friday the 13th.
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
April 13, 2007 -- Kurt Vonnegut's Ice-Nine
Writer Kurt Vonnegut died April 11th. One of his most famous literary creations was not a character but a chemical. Ice-Nine is a form of ice that somehow turns any liquid water it touches into more Ice-Nine. And so, at the end of Vonnegut’s novel Cat’s Cradle, the world ends, not with a bang but with a brrrr. Vonneget clearly had a strong interest in science—he was briefly a chemistry major at Cornell. And according to an article that wikipedia cites from the Journal of Chemical Education, the genesis for the idea for Ice-Nine actually dates back to Irving Langmuir, who won the Nobel Prize in chemistry in 1932. The story goes that Langmuir was showing science fiction pioneer HG Wells around General Electric, where Langmuir worked for over 40 years. Langmuir allegedly mused about a form of water solid at room temperature, thinking that Wells might use the idea, which he didn’t. But Vonnegut wound up working at GE’s PR department, found the story, and filed the nascent Ice-Nine idea away for his own future use. Lots more interesting material about interesting materials in the wikipedia entry for Ice-Nine.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
