Earth Was Longtime Asteroid Punching Bag

Dozens of asteroid impacts at least as bad as the dinosaur killer occurred long after such impacts were previously thought to have petered out. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

An asteroid impact is widely blamed for killing off the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. An asteroid 10 kilometers wide struck the Yucatan peninsula and left a giant crater. It also tossed up enough debris to catastrophically darken the sky and cool the Earth. 

Now a study in the journal Nature indicates that such impacts may have been commonplace in Earth's history. As many as 70 asteroid impacts at least as severe as the one that did in the dinosaurs rocked the planet long after such impacts were thought to have petered out. [William F. Bottke et al., "An Archaean heavy bombardment from a destabilized extension of the asteroid belt"]

The culprit is a hypothesized collection of asteroids called the E belt, only a small remnant of which survives today. The E belt was closer to Earth than the main asteroid belt is now, and it was disrupted by the giant planets as they settled into their current orbits.  


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It had been thought that Earth’s heavy bombardment by asteroids and comets died down about 3.7 billion years ago. But E belt asteroids would have rained down frequently for another two billion years after that, with the occasional dino killer coming in even later on.   All those impacts would have had major effects on life. Somehow, it all worked out for us—if not for the dinosaurs.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Scientific American is part of the Nature Publishing Group.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe