Earthquakes Exert Global Influence

An earthquake in Indonesia can mean future tremors in California. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

A powerful earthquake beneath the Pacific triggers a tsunami that devastates Samoa and American Samoa. Another powerful temblor strikes off the coast of Sumatra. But is there a connection beyond the fact that both sit on the geologically active Ring of Fire that encircles the Pacific Ocean? According to new research published in Nature this week: yes. U.S. seismologists looked back at powerful earthquakes of the past, such as the 2004 seismic event off Sumatra that spawned a killer tsunami throughout southeast Asia. That earthquake, the second largest ever recorded, had a discernible impact on the San Andreas fault half a world away. Earthquakes occur when such faults slip due to weakness or stress. But measuring fault strength has not been possible in the past.  By looking back at the seismic record for the San Andreas fault near Parkfield, Calif., the "Earthquake Capital of the World," the seismologists found that an increase in microquakes there corresponded with subtle shifts in subterranean fluids between 1987 and 2008. Two of these shifts followed nearby earthquakes—within 200 miles—and boosted the number of tiny quakes. But the third shift occurred after the Sumatran quake in 2004. That means a new way to predict quakes in future and the possibility that this week's earthquake-related tragedies could strike on the other side of the Pacific, as well. 

—David Biello

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe