Earth-Like World May Be Just 13 Light-Years Away

Researchers estimate that 6 percent of red dwarf stars may be orbited by Earth-like planets, including a candidate 13 light-years off. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Astronomers have searched far and wide for planets that are the right size and in the right place to support life. Well, maybe they should have set their sights a little closer to home. Because a new study suggests that there may be Earth-like planets just 13 light-years away. The results will be published in The Astrophysical Journal. [Courtney D. Dressing and David Charbonneau, The Occurrence Rate of Small Planets around Small Stars]

To look for worlds that are about the same size as our own, scientists focused their attention, and the planet-seeking Kepler telescope, on red dwarves. These stars are about a third the size of our sun, which is a plus for detecting planets, because an Earth-size body would block more of a smaller star’s light, making it easier to spot.

Looking at the red dwarves that have already been ‘scoped out by Kepler, the scientists discovered that 60 percent of them have planets smaller than Neptune, and 6 percent have planets as warm and cozy as our beloved Earth.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Now, three out of every four stars in our galaxy is a red dwarf. So if some four billion stars in our neighborhood alone shine on an Earth-like planet, our extrasolar backyard may turn be a pretty lively place.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe